Midnight’s children

Pink and white rosesWhen I was younger a thick book was a good book. I am a fast reader and I wanted books that would last me awhile. In the library I therefore went directly towards the heavier tomes and longer series. But things have changed, these days I find myself drawn towards the shorter fiction, preferring books with less than 300 pages. If a book approaches 400 pages I get easily distracted and start to read other books in parallel. This was the case for Midnight’s children (538 pages) which I have been reading on and off for several months.

Midnight’s children by Salman Rushdie is an award-winning novel following the protagonist Saleem Sinai who is born on the stroke of midnight of the day India gained independence. His history thus runs parallel to the history of India and events in his own life are often mirrored in Indian history (at least that is how he prefers to tell it). It is a meandering story, moving from the mundane to the magical, from trivial occurrences in the life of Saleem Sinai to major historical events.

I struggled quite a bit with the novel in the beginning. It is very well-written but I got lost among all the names and historical references which I was only vaguely familiar with. I therefore repeatedly put it aside to read other books. Of course that meant that I had forgotten even more names by the time I came back to it. However, about halfway in, the book picked-up pace a bit and I decided to make a concentrated effort to read in it every day. From there on my impression of it greatly improved, I started to know who (almost) everyone were, the story suddenly made sense and I actually enjoyed it. 

It’s not really like any other book I have read but the book I associated it closest with is another book from my Classic Club reading list, Gösta Berling’s Saga by Selma Lagerlöf. The settings couldn’t be more different, in Midnight’s children we follow the protagonist (and his ancestors) over several decades as he moves across India and Pakistan, whereas Gösta Berling’s Saga takes place in Värmland, a sparsely populated Swedish region during a single year. However, both books feature larger than life protagonists, a small touch of magic, and are narrated in a style that stays close to oral tradition. More importantly, they are both more a rich portrait of a country (or a county in Lagerlöf’s case) than a linear story.

First published in 1981, Midnight’s children is one of the youngest books in my Classics Club reading challenge.

This weekend there is also an Indian Literature Readathon arranged by Nandini, Shruti, Charvi and Aditi. Unfortunately I don’t have time to join but head over there if you are interested in Indian reading recommendations.


11 thoughts on “Midnight’s children

  1. I read this many years ago but scarcely remember any of the details, save that I was intrigued by a hero born in 1948, the same year as me though obviously not at the same time! (I think this is also the year Rushdie was born.) I really, really should reread it, with more intelligence and a bit more attention to detail. But first I should finish Rushdie”s ‘The Moor’ s Last Sigh’ which I never actually completed.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It is a novel which would benefit from a re-read. At least I certainly felt that there were much that went passed me in this read. However, right now I’m very satisfied with having read it once 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I agree, it’s similar for me. Before I blogged, longer books were preferable. Now I don’t mind them, but I like shorter books more than I did before 😀 I also have Midnight’s Children, and I was even going to read it for the Indian Readathon last week! But then I couldn’t join everyone. Well, one day 🙂 however, after buying that book, I read another one by Salman Rushdie and didn’t really enjoy it – so I am a liiiiitle bit reluctant to pick up Midnight Children now too. It sounds like it has a lot of the same things I disliked in the other book… The abundance of characters and the way it’s so slow going.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I wouldn’t exactly call it slow but it is certainly full of characters and the story drifts away from the main plot pretty much the whole time. Next time I read Rushdie I’ll look for his shortest work whichever that is…


  3. I read this years ago too and now only remember the quantity of characters and a feeling of being at sea with it! You’re right about the strong oral tradition, I hadn’t thought that, may be it would be a good one to listen to? I haven’t read any Rushdie since. An especially gorgeous photo!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.